Fifth

Fifth: What Sarkhi considers a research paper or a book-as his spokesman said to the media in a response to Ahmed Al-Hasan-consists of nothing but these lines mentioned in the fourth point, which he imagined to be a response. Had he known how to skip the tedious wordiness and vulgar language, he would have shortened to a single line what he imagined to be problem concerning a Quranic verse used as an example in the Enlightenments book. Is this (worthless) line being called a book in response to Ahmed Al-Hasan? But there is no harm, for you have inherited the drums of Muawiya and Ibn Al-Aas. As the old saying goes: if you have no shame, do whatever you want.

In any case, Sarkhi and many others before him have misinterpreted the Quranic verse. I will show the mistakes in the interpretation and understanding they hold. The invalidity of their interpretation will be shown by explaining the Quranic verse, as well as mentioning the erroneous possibilities and refuting them.